Issue Management in Project Management
We all recognise the crucial role of good issue management in project management, yet executing it effectively can be a challenge. In this article, we look at the differences between issue and risk management, and focus on strategies for impeccable issue management within your organisation and project teams.
What is an issue?
An issue is a project risk that has escalated into a current problem. Ideally, your team will have identified all the risks which could negatively impact your project in the planning phase. If your team was thorough in the planning phase, you may have already anticipated the issue, and have a mitigation plan ready.
Issues can have varying degrees of impact. An issue may only influence the short-term progress of your project, or it may impact overall project success. The defining characterisic of all issues is that they form a materialised problem with negative implications.
It’s important to emphasise that an issue is always current. Therefore, issues differ from risks, and require decisions to be made.
- Risks are potential problems that have not truly manifested. Therefore, project managers should monitor them, and manage them through a risk register.
- When project managers make decisions to resolve problems, the decision itself is not an issue. However, if the project manager puts off making a decision, it will likely evolve into an issue.
What is Issue Management?
Issue management is the process of monitoring, analysing, and prioritising issues through set processes and structures. The ideal outcome of issue management is the successful mitigation or resolution of the issue itself.
Risk management vs Issue Management
We can think of issue management as the step after risk management. Project managers use risk management to identify potential problems pre-emptively. Effective risk management ensures the project manager can resolve the risk before it occurs, or prepare for the its occurrence. An issue, by nature, is a current problem, and often project managers approach it in a reactionary way.
Why is Issue Management Important?
Issue management is valuable because it maintains project stability and efficiency throughout the project lifecycle. A project manager needs be hyper-aware, flexible, and agile to respond appropriately to any issues. The balance of agility and accuracy is key: because the issue has eventuated, there is a smaller margin for error, and limited time to act. Teams use analysis and response frameworks which have been designed to respond promptly to issues. This, of course, minimises the negative impact of the issue on the project.
Issue management is becoming increasingly important in our digitised and fast-paced society. Especially in the age of social media, mishandling or ignoring issues can attract much negative attention. While not all issues are media-worthy, it is important to have a robust framework that minimises any impacts of the issue.
Issue Management Process
Issue management frameworks or processes will vary from organisation to organisation. However, there are five key components to an effective process.
Step One: Identify and document issues
The first step in issue management is to identify the issues at hand. Project managers should look over issues and risks which are being currently monitored, and assess whether there are any issues which have gone unidentified.
Teams who make an active effort to identify problems in the planning stages are therefore much more likely to catch issues early. Project managers then evaluate if these problems are indeed issues, and document them in an Issue Log.
The Project Management Institute recommends applying a formal structure to clearly define the issue and its impacts. Their proposed format is:
“Given that
has occurred, the current status , affecting as follows .”
For example:
“Given that the product technical designer is unable to agree on the specific technical solution (the issue), the current development sprint has been halted (current status), affecting the project timeline, cost and product scope (project objectives) in a way that is threatening the entire project (impact)”
Step Two: Analyse and prioritise the right issues
Once project managers have identified all issues, they can analyse, evaluate, and prioritise them. An issue matrix is a valuable tool teams can use to evaluate the severity of an issue. While a risk matrix often considers the probability of occurrence as a critical measure, an issue matrix focuses more on the amount of time needed to resolve an issue before it negatively impacts overall project success.
Teams may define the exact time ranges for each associated level, however, the typical definitions for each level are:
- Immediate: requires a resolution within the next 5 working days or project success will be negatively impacted
- Urgent: requires a resolution within the next 10 working days or project success will be negatively impacted
- Important: requires resolutions within the next month or project success will be negatively impacted
- Timely: requires a resolution within the next month or other activities within the project will be disrupted
- Convenient: decision can be withheld for more than one month
With the help of this matrix, teams can easily allocate an issue-level rating to each individual issue. From there, they can prioritise issues by those which will have greatest detrimental impact on the project’s success.
Step Three: Create an issue action plan
This is where the bulk of the plan lies. While some of the issue plan can be a handover from risk management, you should ensure your organisation has clear handover guidelines in place. This is particularly important if the person who didn’t write the risk assessment is managing the issue. During this step it is important to assign an issue owner to the issue. Their responsibility is to monitor the issue’s progress, keep track of actions, and provide stakeholders with status updates.
To create an issue action plan teams will need to:
- Set a solution deadline
- Determine what resources or stakeholders are required
- Outline the steps to resolve the issue
- Add the issue action plan to the general project management plan
- Align all actions with other project activities
- Ensures your issue action plan won’t cause further issues
Step Four: Monitor progress and execute the issue action plan
Once a project manager defines and assigns the action plan, they should track the ensuing actions. If you’re following a typical monitoring process, the issue owners will monitor these actions for any emerging risks. Issue owners will be tasked with reporting, managing, and closing the issue they are responsible for.
Step Five: Review and improve the issue management process
At the end of each issue resolution, it is important to review the actions made. You might identify opportunities where processes can be optimised, or actions can be completed differently. Teams can produce an issue register that logs all issues and their resolution. We strongly recommend using RAID Logs (Risks, Assumptions, Issues, Decisions) as an issue register, as it allows teams to reference previous action plans. Whatever issue log you use, it can assist you in evaluating how much control the team has over project success. If there are too many issues arising, teams may have an inadequate project planning framework. With this knowledge, you can improve frameworks to prevent projects experiencing continuous issues.
Simple ways to ensure your issue management is successful
Issue management can seem overwhelming. However, keeping some key considerations in mind can ensure your issue management is successful:
- Report issues early, and check them frequently.
- Use an issue management solution with real-time data.
- Define a clear escalation process.
- Use a colour coding system- traffic lights (red/amber/green) is our favourite.
- Learn from historic data, and refine your issue management processes accordingly.
Take your risk and issue management activities to the next level with pmo365
With our intuitive RAID logs and integrative system, pmo365 can consolidate all your project-related activities onto a single platform. This ensures you always have the most accurate data on hand, which informs your risk and issue management actions and helps you continuously and accurately monitor performance. Learn how pmo365 does this with our free trial.
IIR: Introduce, Integrate, Replace
Step 01
Introduce
You cannot run a portfolio on Excel and PowerPoint alone.
Project portfolio management is the discipline of seeing every project in one place, prioritising the work that matters, allocating people against demand, and governing delivery with real numbers. It is not optional at any serious scale. The moment you have more projects than one person can hold in their head, you need a single, current view of status, schedule, cost, resource and risk.
Excel and PowerPoint feel free because there is no licence conversation. The real cost is elsewhere. It is the hours spent maintaining workbooks, the version confusion, and the numbers that go stale the moment they are pasted.
A spreadsheet cannot tell you, on demand, which projects are at risk, where your people are over-committed next quarter, or how much of the portfolio budget is actually spent.
Introducing a proper PPM platform is the first step. Not to add another tool for its own sake, but to give the portfolio one place where the data lives together and stays live.
Step 02
Integrate
The instinct after buying a PPM platform is to make everyone move into it. That is the fastest way to fail. Project managers already have tools they trust, and finance already has systems of record. Force a migration on day one and you get resistance, shadow spreadsheets, and a dataset nobody believes.
Integrate first. Meet the data where it already is. Two directions matter.
Direction 01
Enterprise systems
Connect to the finance or ERP layer so actuals, commitments and budgets flow in automatically. Reporting stops being a monthly reconciliation and becomes a live view. Nobody rekeys a spend figure again.
Direction 02
The tools PMs already use
The direction most platforms neglect, and arguably the more important. The portfolio should read from the PM's own tools, not force people to abandon them.
The reason this matters is simple. That data is already there, and it is kept current by the person closest to it. When the portfolio reads directly from these sources, the status report updates itself. No chasing, no copy and paste, no reporting lag. The PM keeps working the way they always have, and the board gets a live picture as a side effect.
Step 03
Replace
Integration buys you two things: trust, and live data. Once both are in place, you look at what can go.
Every organisation carries tools and spreadsheets that either do not do the job well or carry a heavy maintenance overhead. The classic example is the resource spreadsheet. It is a workbook someone maintains by hand to track who is on what. It is always slightly out of date, owned by one person, and impossible to reconcile against real demand.
Replace it with the equivalent function in your PPM.
A proper demand management capability does what the spreadsheet was reaching for, with none of the overhead. It models demand against capacity across the whole portfolio, updates as projects shift, and needs no manual upkeep.
Replace deliberately, one function at a time, and only after the platform has earned it. The test is simple: if a spreadsheet is high overhead or low quality, and the platform does the same job natively, retire the spreadsheet.
The payoff
You stop producing reports and start reading them
Follow IIR and the nature of reporting changes. The status view is current because it is fed by the tools people already use and the systems that already hold the money. The overhead that used to consume the last week of every month disappears, because there is nothing to assemble.
That is the whole point of real-time reporting. Not a prettier deck, but a portfolio you can look at any day of the month and trust, at a fraction of the effort it takes today.
Built on Microsoft 365. Native ground for IIR.
pmo365 integrates with the tools your teams already run in, so the path from Introduce to Integrate to Replace is a natural progression rather than a rip and replace.